<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Admin Blogishness &#187; phpdocs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.linux-tech.net/category/phpdocs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.linux-tech.net</link>
	<description>Hiding inside the Kernel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PHP :: Docs, here we come!</title>
		<link>http://blog.linux-tech.net/2007/12/01/php-docs-here-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.linux-tech.net/2007/12/01/php-docs-here-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 08:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Whiting</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phpdocs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.linux-tech.net/2007/12/01/php-docs-here-we-come/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, after a bit of harassment and whatnot (people harassing me, mind you), I&#8217;m releasing the LTN :: PHP patch and distribution, as well as maintaining an (un)official php mirror.
What is this distribution you may ask? Yeah, ok , maybe you don&#8217;t care, but I&#8217;ll answer anyways   .The LTN Distribution of php is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, after a bit of harassment and whatnot (people harassing me, mind you), I&#8217;m releasing the LTN :: PHP patch and distribution, as well as maintaining an <a href="http://www.php-docs.org/" title="(un)official php mirror">(un)official php mirror</a>.</p>
<p>What is this distribution you may ask? Yeah, ok , maybe you don&#8217;t care, but I&#8217;ll answer anyways <img src='http://blog.linux-tech.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  .<span id="more-13"></span>The LTN Distribution of php is a bit more advanced, and quite a bit more secure than the &#8220;standard&#8221; distribution of php. How so?</p>
<p>Firstly, LTN :: php incorporates mail patches which have been updated, since  the php5 (and 4) updates to mail headers. This means that you&#8217;re going to SEE who&#8217;s abusing what script, instead of actually wondering WTF is going on! Great idea, unfortunately, support by author is sporaddic, so I&#8217;ve added this to the list.</p>
<p>Secondly , <a href="http://www.suhosin.org" title="suhosin">suhosin</a> support is added in. I&#8217;m not talking about a crappy &#8220;module&#8221;, I&#8217;m talking about patched into the core of php. Modules are great, but they suck when you recompile php and they can&#8217;t be activated. BOOOH!</p>
<p>Should LTN :: PHP  be trusted? I&#8217;ll say this for it. I use it myself, and recommend that ALL individuals use it. Why? Because I said so, damnit. Ok, ok, so you need a better reason than that, I get it.</p>
<ol>
<li>PHP is insecure. I&#8217;m not talking just globals, mail, etc, but the whole thing, it&#8217;s shot, and insecure. It&#8217;s good, but it doesn&#8217;t do jack for &#8220;security&#8221;.</li>
<li>PHP has bad mail handling capabilities. I mean, bad, bad, bad. They&#8217;ve improved on them, but it is still possible (with proper abilities) to send out mass spam to individuals. This should be stopped @ the core.</li>
<li>PHP has functions which are easily abused. Rather than DISABLE those functions, wouldn&#8217;t it seem more appropriate to patch the functions so that hey, they&#8217;re not so abusable? I mean, usability is key. If I can&#8217;t USE php functions, why, on god&#8217;s green earth am I bothering to use php as a core language, right?</li>
<li>PHP constantly releases premature, buggy releases. Rather than use something that&#8217;s premature, problematic and ick, why not use something that&#8217;s stable, utilized and tested? I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m not going to update php patches when necessary (cuz I will), but I&#8217;m not going to patch and update immediately. It&#8217;ll happen soon after the original release gets put out (within 2 weeks) to ensure that everything is dandy and copacetic.</li>
</ol>
<p>The bottom line? Why NOT provide your clients with some sort of security? And hey, documentation, not a bad thing either! Took a couple hours to get 2.x gig across, but it&#8217;s there, and I will sync daily, so THAT part will be 100% updated and current. Support your local linux tech, use the <strong>UNofficial</strong> <a href="http://www.php-docs.org/" title="Unofficial PHP Documentation">php documentation!</a></p>
<p>Peace out, enjoy your weekends.</p>
<p>P.S.:<br />
I know I owe you a bit of an update on the RBL thing. I&#8217;ve been working on it. In the meantime, please, feel free to track the stats <a href="http://rbl.linux-tech.net/" title="here">here</a>. These are real time stats, updated whenever something happens . I&#8217;ve been a bit swamped lately with a rather large project, so bear with me. I promise, I&#8217;ll get it there, it&#8217;ll just take time!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.php-docs.org/" title="Unofficial PHP Documentation"></a></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fblog.linux-tech.net%2F2007%2F12%2F01%2Fphp-docs-here-we-come%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'PHP+%3A%3A+Docs%2C+here+we+come%21';
  addthis_pub    = 'twhiting9275';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.linux-tech.net/2007/12/01/php-docs-here-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
